Who could shoot down a great idea based on sound research and motivated by the best of intentions?
If the idea crept out of the incestuous swamp we call Washington, I would summarily execute that idea. No blindfold, no last cigarette, no drum roll, as fast as they could foment new ideas; I would gun them down.
Wait, I know what you're thinking...
"I just hate all government so it stands to reason I would hate any idea that came from government officials."
I understand why you might feel that way, but my judgment is not based on knee-jerk emotional reactions or some visceral reflex. In truth, I have a great deal of respect for government so long as the government has a great deal of respect for the Constitution, and not a second longer. You see as long as the government respects the Constitution it is bound by the ideals it embodies. The foremost of which is, the government must respect my person, my faith, my privacy, my property, my liberty, and yours as well. When one takes the time for thoughtful deliberation rather than flying off on some rash tangent because it feels good at the moment it is a sign of wisdom. The virtue of wisdom, like all other virtues, are nearly extinct in Washington.
Unintended consequences are the political equivalent of Sir Isaac Newton's third law of motion, which states “for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction”.
1. The Treaty
of Versailles was not supposed to incite the German people to into provoking
another world war, but it did.
2. The “Great
Society” programs were not intended to increase out-of-wedlock births and broken
families, but it has.
3. Extended
unemployment benefits were not meant to discourage employment searches or
dissuade entrepreneurship, but it has.
4. Guaranteeing
the solvency of the banks was not meant to make them more reckless in their
lending and investing practices, but it has.
5. Social
Security and Medicare was not meant to nearly eliminate personal planning for
retirement, but it has.
6. Easy credit
loans were not intended to create massive foreclosures, destroying families,
and their finances, but it did.
7. Student
Loans were not intended to send tuition costs skyrocketing while trapping
graduates in a crushing debt load which threatens to destroy their careers
before they begin, but they did.
8. Farm
Subsidies were not intended to artificially raise the price of food and
diminish the production so high that low income families required Food Stamps
to eat, but they did.
9. The welfare
system was not intended to become a snare for the impoverished entrapping them
at a serf like subsistence existence for generations, but it does.
10.
Public schools were not intended to produce the
lowest common denominator of education with continuously declining standards,
but it has.
If
this were the total of the unintended consequences produced by the short-sighted,
herd-mentality policy makers we seem to have no shortage of in Washington it
wouldn't be so bad, however it isn't the total and it is worse...
And yet more unintended consequences...
And more...
I could go on but at this point I'm too disgusted to write...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Flex your First Amendment Rights and speak your mind...